:: Da' Militant One's Lair ::
Da' Militant One has arrived to ''tell it like it is'' and give his unique perspective on today's issues across the political, social, and economic landscapes. His specialty is stickin' it to ''the Man''. Email at Militantone@comcast.net| [::..archive..::] |
|---|
| [::..recommended..::] |
| :: google [>] |
| :: plastic [>] |
| :: davenetics [>] |
:: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 ::
"You Can't Handle The Truth"
Word is that Condi Rice does not want to be placed under oath if she is called to testify in front of the 9/11 Commission" I repeat, it is alleged that Condi Rice does not want to swear to tell the truth under oath. Remember that right after 9/11, she suggested that no one could have predicted that terrorists would hijack planes and crash them into buildings. Intelligence data that was readily available to her indicated other wise. In fact, there was many years of data that showed terrorists might try to hijack planes for various purposes. There were many who hounded Bill Clinton for many years for lying about the Monica Affair. Evidence exists that directly contradicts statements mde by National Security Advisor Condolezza Rice on behalf of George Bush. Should she and Bush get a break because neither one was under oath when Rice made her statements? If Rice has to testify under oath at the 9/11 Commission will she have to admit that her previous statements to the American public were lies? Also, the Commission may ask Bush, Cheney, Clinton, and Gore to testify at the hearing. The catch is that none of the four will be placed under oath. Shouldn't these supposed "servants of the America People" be required to tell the absolute truth about what they knew prior to 9/11? Ah, "You Can't Handle The Truth!"
:: DM1 12/24/2003 03:15:00 AM [+] ::
...
Comments:
Post a Comment
